🔗 Share this article

In my role as a DM, I usually avoided heavy use of luck during my D&D adventures. I preferred was for the plot and what happened in a game to be guided by player choice as opposed to the roll of a die. Recently, I decided to change my approach, and I'm very happy with the result.

The Inspiration: Watching a Custom Mechanic

A well-known actual-play show features a DM who regularly calls for "fate rolls" from the players. He does this by selecting a specific dice and outlining possible results tied to the result. This is at its core no distinct from rolling on a random table, these are devised in the moment when a player's action has no predetermined resolution.

I decided to try this approach at my own table, mainly because it seemed novel and provided a break from my normal practice. The experience were fantastic, prompting me to reconsider the often-debated tension between preparation and improvisation in a tabletop session.

An Emotional Session Moment

In a recent session, my party had survived a city-wide battle. When the dust settled, a player inquired after two key NPCs—a sibling duo—had lived. Instead of picking a fate, I handed it over to chance. I instructed the player to roll a d20. I defined the outcomes as: a low roll, both were killed; on a 5-9, a single one would die; a high roll, they both lived.

The die came up a 4. This triggered a incredibly poignant sequence where the party came upon the corpses of their companions, still clasped together in their final moments. The group performed a ceremony, which was especially meaningful due to earlier roleplaying. As a parting reward, I chose that the NPCs' bodies were suddenly restored, containing a enchanted item. I rolled for, the item's magical effect was precisely what the party lacked to solve another critical quest obstacle. One just plan such magical coincidences.

Improving DM Agility

This incident led me to ponder if chance and spontaneity are truly the beating heart of this game. Although you are a detail-oriented DM, your ability to adapt may atrophy. Groups often take delight in upending the most carefully laid plots. Therefore, a good DM needs to be able to think quickly and create scenarios in the moment.

Utilizing similar mechanics is a excellent way to train these abilities without going completely outside your comfort zone. The strategy is to deploy them for minor decisions that have a limited impact on the campaign's main plot. For instance, I would not employ it to determine if the central plot figure is a traitor. Instead, I could use it to figure out whether the party enter a room just in time to see a critical event unfolds.

Empowering Collaborative Storytelling

Spontaneous randomization also works to keep players engaged and foster the impression that the game world is responsive, shaping based on their choices immediately. It prevents the sense that they are merely actors in a pre-written script, thereby strengthening the shared nature of the game.

This philosophy has long been embedded in the original design. Early editions were enamored with charts, which suited a playstyle focused on dungeon crawling. Even though current D&D often focuses on narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, this isn't always the only path.

Finding the Healthy Equilibrium

There is absolutely nothing wrong with thorough preparation. However, equally valid no issue with stepping back and permitting the dice to guide minor details in place of you. Direction is a major factor in a DM's role. We require it to manage the world, yet we can be reluctant to cede it, at times when doing so might improve the game.

My final suggestion is this: Do not fear of relinquishing a bit of control. Embrace a little chance for inconsequential outcomes. You might just find that the organic story beat is significantly more powerful than anything you could have planned by yourself.