🔗 Share this article

For a lifelong Dodgers fan and third-generation Mexican American, the most memorable highlight of the baseball championship didn't occur during the tense final game last Saturday, when her squad executed one death-defying comeback feat after another before prevailing in extra innings over the opposing team.

It happened in the previous game, when two supporting players, the Puerto Rican player and Miguel Rojas, executed a thrilling, game-winning play that simultaneously challenged many harmful stereotypes promoted about Latinos in recent decades.

The moment itself was breathtaking: the outfielder raced in from the outfield to snag a ball he initially misjudged in the stadium lights, then fired it to second base to record another, decisive out. the second baseman, at second base, received the ball just a split second before a runner barreled into him, sending him to the ground.

This was not merely a remarkable athletic achievement, perhaps the key turn in momentum in the Dodgers' favor after looking for much of the games like the underdog team. For Molina, it was thrilling, politically and culturally, a badly needed uplift for the community and for Los Angeles after a period of enforcement actions, troops monitoring the neighborhoods, and a steady drumbeat of negativity from national leaders.

"Kike and Miggy put forth this alternative story," explained the professor. "Everyone witnessed Latinos displaying an contagious enthusiasm in what they do, being key figures on the team, exhibiting a different kind of confidence. They're energetic, they're cheering, they're taking off their shirts."

"This represented such a contrast with what we observe on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos thrown to the ground and pursued. It is so easy to be disheartened right now."

Not that it's exactly straightforward to be a Dodgers supporter these days – for Molina or for the many of other Latinos who show up faithfully to matches and occupy as many as 50% of the stadium's fifty thousand seats per game.

A Complicated Connection with the Organization

After intensified enforcement operations began in Los Angeles in early June, and national guard troops were deployed into the area to react to ensuing demonstrations, two of the local sports teams quickly released messages of support with affected communities – but not the baseball team.

The team president stated the organization want to steer clear of political issues – a view influenced, perhaps, by the fact that a significant portion of the supporters, even some Hispanic fans, are supporters of current leaders. After significant public pressure, the team subsequently committed $one million in support for individuals directly affected by the raids but made no public criticism of the administration.

White House Event and Past Heritage

Months before, the organization did not hesitate in agreeing to an invitation to celebrate their 2024 World Series win at the White House – a move that local columnists labeled as "disappointing … spineless … and contradictory", considering the team's boast in having been the first major league team to break the racial segregation in the mid-20th century and the frequent references of that legacy and the principles it represents by executives and current and past athletes. Several players such as the manager had expressed reluctance to travel to the White House during the first term but either changed their minds or gave in to pressure from team management.

Business Control and Supporter Conflicts

An additional complication for supporters is that the Dodgers are controlled by a corporate behemoth, Guggenheim Partners, whose investments, as per sources and its own published balance sheets, involve a share in a private prison corporation that operates detention facilities. Guggenheim's executives has stated repeatedly that it aims to remain neutral of politics, but its detractors say the silence – and the investment – are their own form of acquiescence to certain agendas.

These factors add up to significant mixed feelings among Hispanic supporters in especial – sentiments that emerged even in the euphoria of this year's hard-fought World Series victory and the ensuing outpouring of team pride across Los Angeles.

"Can one to support the team?" local columnist Erick Galindo reflected at the beginning of the playoffs in an thoughtful essay pondering on "Dodger blue in our blood, but uncertainty in our hearts". He couldn't ultimately bring himself to view the World Series, but he still felt deeply, to the point that he decided his one-man boycott must have brought the squad the fortune it required to win.

Separating the Team from the Management

Many fans who share Galindo's misgivings seem to have decided that they can keep to back the team and its lineup of global stars, including the Asian superstar a key player, while expressing disdain on the team's business leadership. Nowhere was this more clear than at the championship parade at Dodger Stadium on Monday, when the packed audience roared in approval of the coach and his athletes but jeered the executive and the top official of the investors.

"The executives in suits do not get to take our boys in blue from us," Molina said. "We've been with the Dodgers longer than they have."

Historical Context and Community Impact

The issue, though, goes further than just the organization's present proprietors. The deal that moved the Brooklyn Dodgers to Los Angeles in the late 1950s involved the municipality demolishing three working-class Hispanic communities on a elevated area above the city center and then selling the property to the organization for a fraction of its market value. A song on a 2005 album that documents the events has an low-income worker at the venue stating that the house he lost to eviction is now third base.

A prominent commentator, perhaps the region's most influential Latino writer and broadcaster, sees a more troubling side to the lengthy, dysfunctional dynamic between the team and its audience. He describes the team the Flamin' Hot Cheetos of baseball, "a business organization with an excessive, even unhealthy devotion by too many Latinos" that has been shortchanging its fans for years.

"They've acted around Hispanic followers while picking their pockets with the other for so long because they have been able to get away with it," Arellano wrote over the warmer months, when calls to boycott the organization over its absence of response to the raids were contradicted by the awkward reality that attendance at matches remained steady, even at the peak of the protests when the city center was subject to a nightly restriction.

International Stars and Community Bonds

Separating the team from its corporate owners is not a simple matter, {